{"id":21459,"date":"2024-09-20T12:20:45","date_gmt":"2024-09-20T16:20:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/desis.osu.edu\/seniorthesis\/?p=21459"},"modified":"2024-09-21T17:42:52","modified_gmt":"2024-09-21T21:42:52","slug":"implantable-drug-delivery-for-symptom-management","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/desis.osu.edu\/seniorthesis\/index.php\/2024\/09\/20\/implantable-drug-delivery-for-symptom-management\/","title":{"rendered":"Implantable Drug Delivery for Symptom Management"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>This study looked at whether using an implantable drug delivery system (IDDS) works better than regular pain medicine for people with cancer who are in serious pain.&nbsp; These patients were already taking high doses of painkillers like morphine but still had pain.&nbsp; The study found that IDDS helped reduce pain more effectively and caused fewer side effects than regular treatment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>By the fourth week, people using the IDDS saw a big improvement in pain, with a &#8220;60% reduction in pain, while the CMM group only experienced a 37% reduction (P = 0.002)&#8221; (Smith et al., 2005).&nbsp; This means the IDDS worked better at controlling pain.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The study also showed that IDDS helped lower the side effects of pain medications.&nbsp; At four weeks, &#8220;IDDS patients had a 55% reduction in toxicity compared to 20% in the CMM group (P = 0.0003)&#8221; (Smith et al., 2005).&nbsp; By 12 weeks, those using IDDS had a &#8220;66% reduction in toxicity,&#8221; while the CMM group only had a 37% reduction.&nbsp; This is important because &#8220;toxicities are one of the most important reasons for non-compliance with pain medicine regimens&#8221; (Smith et al., 2005), meaning fewer side effects made it easier for patients to stick with their treatment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>While the study wasn\u2019t focused on survival, it found that more people using IDDS were still alive after six months (52-54%) compared to those using regular treatment (32%) (Smith et al., 2005).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Smith, T. J., Coyne, P. J., Staats, P. S., Deer, T., Stearns, L. J., Rauck, R. L., Boortz-Marx, R. L., Buchser, E., Catal\u00e0, E., Bryce, D. A., Cousins, M., &amp; Pool, G. E. (2005). An implantable drug delivery system (idds) for refractory cancer pain provides sustained pain control, less drug-related toxicity, and possibly better survival compared with Comprehensive Medical Management (CMM). <em>Annals of Oncology<\/em>, <em>16<\/em>(5), 825\u2013833. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/annonc\/mdi156<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Engineer Jobs. (2016). <em>&#8220;Implantable drug delivery device fights cancer while maintaining patients&#8217; health&#8221;<\/em> [Image]. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theengineer.co.uk\/content\/news\/implantable-drug-delivery-device-fights-cancer-while-maintaining-patients-health\/\">https:\/\/www.theengineer.co.uk\/content\/news\/implantable-drug-delivery-device-fights-cancer-while-maintaining-patients-health\/<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This study looked at whether using an implantable drug delivery system (IDDS) works better than regular pain medicine for people with cancer who are in serious pain.&nbsp; These patients were already taking high doses of painkillers like morphine but still had pain.&nbsp; The study found that IDDS helped reduce pain more effectively and caused fewer [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121,"featured_media":21542,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-21459","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-focus"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/desis.osu.edu\/seniorthesis\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21459","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/desis.osu.edu\/seniorthesis\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/desis.osu.edu\/seniorthesis\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/desis.osu.edu\/seniorthesis\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/121"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/desis.osu.edu\/seniorthesis\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21459"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/desis.osu.edu\/seniorthesis\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21459\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21543,"href":"https:\/\/desis.osu.edu\/seniorthesis\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21459\/revisions\/21543"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/desis.osu.edu\/seniorthesis\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/21542"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/desis.osu.edu\/seniorthesis\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21459"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/desis.osu.edu\/seniorthesis\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21459"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/desis.osu.edu\/seniorthesis\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21459"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}